Loading…
8
Warning: My 'silly' method for finding a lost artifact actually worked
I was gridding a site near Tucson and lost a small bone awl in some loose dirt, so I tried gently sifting the area with a kitchen colander from my camp gear. Found it in about 15 minutes, which saved me a whole afternoon of careful troweling. Anyone have a weird but effective field trick they're almost embarrassed to admit works?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
sanchez.ivan5mo ago
Tucson dirt is no joke, that stuff swallows small finds whole. I would never call that method silly, it's just practical field adaptation. Honestly, sifting with what you have on hand is basic archaeology, not a weird trick. Why would anyone be embarrassed about using a solid technique that gets results?
6
lucashenderson5mo ago
One summer in Georgia, we were trying to clear a brick feature and the dust was just coating everything. Someone grabbed a clean garden sprayer meant for plants and used it as a gentle mister. It kept the dust down and let us see the mortar lines way better. We called it redneck conservation, but it worked like a charm.
6
abby_murphy5mo ago
The 2005 dig at the old Miller farmstead, we lost a clay pipe stem in a root mat. My supervisor spent two hours with tweezers before I quietly got a cheap plastic spray bottle from the dollar store, filled it with water, and turned the dirt to mud. The stem floated right up. Sanchez.ivan is right that good methods aren't silly, but sometimes the "silly" part is just using a tool in a way that feels wrong until it works perfectly. That spray bottle looked ridiculous next to the proper tools, but it saved the day.
6
dianawilson2mo ago
Gotta push back on this one. That spray bottle trick sounds like it risked damaging the whole context, water can make some soils collapse or mess with delicate organics. Tweezers and patience might have been the real professional approach, even if it took longer.
3