My filling comparison changed after one bad experience with composite

I used to push composite fillings for everyone, but after doing a molar in 2019 that failed within 14 months, I switched my approach for back teeth. The dentist down the hall said 'amalgam still beats composite for durability in high-stress areas', and the data backs him up. Anyone else shift their material picks after a specific case went sideways?

0 comments

0 Comments

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this discussion.