That time a grad student corrected my 'Clovis First' take at a dig site
I was at a dig in New Mexico back in 2018, just helping move dirt, and I mentioned finding a spear point. This grad student, maybe 22 years old, just looked at me and said 'You know that point is older than Clovis, right?' She pulled out a paper from 2017 about the Buttermilk Creek site in Texas showing pre-Clovis dates. I had been smug about Clovis being the first people in the Americas since my college intro class. Made me realize how fast this field changes if you are not actually reading the latest studies. Anybody else had a younger researcher completely flip your thinking on something?